Beer
September 26, 2021, 12:57pm
1
Belonging to an organisation using Gitea, I submitted a PR to one of the repositories.
When the PR got merged, it said I did the merge, whil actually someone else (admin) did it.
Are there knobs to turn to avoid that impersonation behaviour? I find the fact this is even possible worrying.
eeyrjmr
September 26, 2021, 3:06pm
2
isn’t’ this more a matter of admin doing the merge and iirc there is a PR open for this
opened 02:27PM - 23 Sep 21 UTC
### Feature Description
Say I am one of the 'owners' of a repo and I've set b… ranch protection on the `main` branch. Specifically, I've set required approvals to 3.
This works fine for the most part, but on the pull request it shows 'As an administrator, you may still merge this pull request.':
So I could click the red 'Rebase and Merge' button and bypass the required approvals.
A feature I would really like would be a way to disable this ability. So that, even as an owner, I don't get this option to merge the PR without approvals.
Now I understand that, as owner of the repo, I have ultimate control of the settings. If I wanted to, I could go into settings and remove the need for required approvals. But that is quite an involved process which under normal circumstances I wouldn't do.
However, I want to avoid the temptation for an owner to quickly merge a PR without getting approvals granted first.
If I could just disable this merge button from showing, until approvals have been granted, then that would improve usability.
### Screenshots
_No response_